|
KMID : 0608320200270020126
|
|
Physical Therapy Korea
2020 Volume.27 No. 2 p.126 ~ p.132
|
|
|
The Effects of Augmented Somatosensory Feedback on Postural Sway and Muscle Co-contraction in Different Sensory Conditions
|
|
Kim Seo-Hyun
Lee Kyung-Eun
Lim One-Bin
Yi Chung-Hwi
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Background: Augmented somatosensory feedback stimulates the mechanoreceptor to de-liver information on bodily position, improving the postural control. The various types of such feedback include ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) and vibration. The optimal feedback to mitigate postural sway remains unclear, as does the effect of augmented somatosensory feedback on muscle co-contraction.
Objects: We compared postural sway and ankle muscle co-contraction without feedback (control) and with either of two forms of somatosensory feedback (AFOs and vibration).
Methods: We recruited 15 healthy subjects and tested them under three feedback condi-tions (control, AFOs, vibration) with two sensory conditions (eyes open, or eyes closed and the head tilted back), in random order. Postural sway was measured using a force platform; the mean sway area of the 95% confidence ellipse (AREA) and the mean velocity of the center-of-pressure displacement (VEL) were assessed. Co-contraction of the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles was measured using electromyography and converted into a co-contraction index (CI).
Results: We found significant main effects of the three feedback states on postural sway (AREA, VEL) and the CI. The two sensory conditions exerted significant main effects on pos-tural sway (AREA and VEL). AFOs reduced postural sway to a level significantly lower than that of the control (p = 0.014, p < 0.001) or that afforded by vibration (p = 0.024, p < 0.001). In terms of CI amelioration, the AFOs condition was significantly better than the control (p = 0.004). Vibration did not significantly improve either postural sway or the CI compared to the control condition. There was no significant interaction effect between the three feedback conditions and the two sensory conditions.
Conclusion: Lower-extremity devices such as AFOs enhance somatosensory perception, im-proving postural control and decreasing the CI during static standing.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Feedback, Postural balance,, Posture, Proprioception
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|